● Funding · 50 states + DC

Let’s find the money for your team.

You probably don’t need to fundraise. Most robotics money is already appropriated to schools — the trick is knowing which pot to point at and what words to use. Find your state below.

$1.39Bfederal CTE money went to the states this year

6states run a grant specifically for robotics teams

$599is what you’re actually asking for. It’s a small ask.

2 wkstypical approval when it’s under your district’s bid threshold

● Start here

One rule explains almost every state.

Equipment, tools and your stipend are usually fundable. Students’ personal registration fees and individual travel usually aren’t.

Group transportation is often the exception that is covered. And in several states, running your team under an official student organisation — TSA and SkillsUSA both host robotics events — flips student travel and fees from “no” to “yes.” If your state is strict, that’s the door.

The fastest route needs nobody’s approval at all.

A single $49 Micro sits below the threshold where almost any district requires a quote, a purchase order or a business-office signature. Most teachers can put one on a purchasing card, or crowdfund it on DonorsChoose in a fortnight. That gets you into all seven Season One events — enough to run Line Follow and Mini Sumo on a table and find out whether your students love this before anyone fills in a form.

The grants and CTE money below are for when you’re ready to field a full competition team. They’re worth the paperwork — but they are not the only door, and they are not the first one.

Two purchases, two different pots
What you’re buying	Where the money comes from	How long
$49 Micro one tabletop robot, seven events	Teacher purchasing card · DonorsChoose · PTA · a local sponsor · department supplies	Days
$599 Team Kit three robots, all fifteen events	CTE and career-tech equipment budgets · state robotics grants · federal career-tech funds	Weeks to a season

This split matters more than it looks. Career-tech money is generally meant for durable equipment, and a $49 robot is unambiguously treated as a consumable supply rather than equipment — so asking for a Micro out of a career-tech budget is the one request likely to bounce. Ask for Micros and Solos from discretionary money, and Team Kits from equipment money.

💰

Ask for equipment

A team kit is durable equipment your school keeps and reuses, not a consumable supply. That single word changes which budget line it comes from — say equipment.

🎓

Say “career and technical”

Framed as CTE and workforce skills, robotics sits in a protected budget line. Framed as enrichment, it competes with everything else. Same programme, very different odds.

⏱️

Ask in February

Districts set next year’s budgets between February and April, and buy in May and June. Ask in November and you’ll hear “maybe next year” — ask in February and next year is the one being planned.

● All 50 states + DC

Find your state.

Type your state or click a filter. The dollar figure is what your state received in federal career-and-technical education money this year — some of it is already earmarked for programmes like yours.

Showing all 51

State	Federal CTE funds this year	Grant that could fund your team	Status	Who to ask
Alabama AL	$24,481,712	AMSTI Robotics Grant	Robotics grant	Alabama State Dept of Education / AMSTI
Alaska AK	$5,909,176	We’re still checking	Researching	Alaska Dept of Education & Early Development
Arizona AZ	$34,386,034	CTE State Priority Grant (formula)	CTE funding	Arizona Dept of Education
Arkansas AR	$14,872,770	We’re still checking	Researching	Arkansas Dept of Education
California CA	$142,867,852	CTEIG ($450M) + K12 Strong Workforce ($150M)	CTE funding	California Dept of Education
Colorado CO	$21,270,174	We’re still checking	Researching	Colorado Dept of Education
Connecticut CT	$12,258,341	We’re still checking	Researching	Connecticut State Dept of Education
Delaware DE	$6,330,763	We’re still checking	Researching	Delaware Dept of Education
Florida FL	$83,166,060	None — CAPE performance funding via FEFP	CTE funding	Florida Dept of Education
Georgia GA	$51,794,555	We’re still checking	Researching	Georgia Dept of Education
Hawaii HI	$7,020,601	We’re still checking	Researching	Hawaii State Dept of Education
Idaho ID	$8,880,905	STEM Connect Grants	Robotics grant	Idaho STEM Action Center
Illinois IL	$50,778,126	We’re still checking	Researching	Illinois State Board of Education
Indiana IN	$32,395,090	K-12 Robotics Competition Grant	Robotics grant	Indiana Dept of Education
Iowa IA	$14,527,005	Iowa STEM Scale-Up Program	CTE funding	Iowa Dept of Education
Kansas KS	$13,092,776	We’re still checking	Researching	Kansas State Dept of Education
Kentucky KY	$22,022,485	We’re still checking	Researching	Kentucky Dept of Education
Louisiana LA	$24,718,010	We’re still checking	Researching	Louisiana Dept of Education
Maine ME	$7,020,601	We’re still checking	Researching	Maine Dept of Education
Maryland MD	$20,809,864	We’re still checking	Researching	Maryland State Dept of Education
Massachusetts MA	$23,372,201	DESE STEM grant programs	CTE funding	Mass. Dept of Elementary & Secondary Education
Michigan MI	$46,663,531	Robotics Competition Grant (99h) + MiSTEM	Robotics grant	Michigan Dept of Education
Minnesota MN	$21,461,494	We’re still checking	Researching	Minnesota Dept of Education
Mississippi MS	$15,927,755	We’re still checking	Researching	Mississippi Dept of Education
Missouri MO	$28,237,668	We’re still checking	Researching	Missouri Dept of Elementary & Secondary Education
Montana MT	$6,791,592	We’re still checking	Researching	Montana Office of Public Instruction
Nebraska NE	$8,264,969	We’re still checking	Researching	Nebraska Dept of Education
Nevada NV	$12,837,087	None dedicated — OSIT STEM grants; DRI teacher PD	CTE funding	Nevada Dept of Education
New Hampshire NH	$7,020,601	We’re still checking	Researching	New Hampshire Dept of Education
New Jersey NJ	$29,200,049	We’re still checking	Researching	New Jersey Dept of Education
New Mexico NM	$10,483,958	We’re still checking	Researching	New Mexico Public Education Dept
New York NY	$64,494,920	We’re still checking	Researching	New York State Education Dept
North Carolina NC	$48,775,344	We’re still checking	Researching	North Carolina Dept of Public Instruction
North Dakota ND	$5,909,176	We’re still checking	Researching	North Dakota Dept of Public Instruction
Ohio OH	$52,648,058	CTE Equipment Grant; CTE Access Grant ($3.2M)	CTE funding	Ohio Dept of Education & Workforce
Oklahoma OK	$18,421,086	We’re still checking	Researching	Oklahoma Dept of Career & Technology Education
Oregon OR	$17,358,056	We’re still checking	Researching	Oregon Dept of Education
Pennsylvania PA	$50,954,913	PAsmart — Planning to $75K, Innovation to $500K	CTE funding	Pennsylvania Dept of Education
Rhode Island RI	$7,020,601	We’re still checking	Researching	Rhode Island Dept of Education
South Carolina SC	$24,612,626	We’re still checking	Researching	South Carolina Dept of Education
South Dakota SD	$6,020,921	We’re still checking	Researching	South Dakota Dept of Education
Tennessee TN	$30,746,117	We’re still checking	Researching	Tennessee Dept of Education
Texas TX	$129,035,986	None — CTE Allotment (formula, 1.1–1.48×)	CTE funding	Texas Education Agency
Utah UT	$17,394,096	STEM Competition Grant	Robotics grant	Utah STEM Action Center
Vermont VT	$5,909,176	We’re still checking	Researching	Vermont Agency of Education
Virginia VA	$32,403,569	We’re still checking	Researching	Virginia Dept of Education
Washington WA	$26,008,640	We’re still checking	Researching	Washington Office of Supt. of Public Instruction
West Virginia WV	$9,807,295	We’re still checking	Researching	West Virginia Dept of Education
Wisconsin WI	$25,516,443	Robotics League Participation Grants	Robotics grant	Wisconsin Dept of Public Instruction
Wyoming WY	$5,909,176	We’re still checking	Researching	Wyoming Dept of Education
District of Columbia DC	$5,909,176	We’re still checking	Researching	Office of the State Superintendent of Education

“Researching” doesn’t mean there’s nothing there. It means we haven’t finished digging through that state’s grant programmes yet — the federal figure is solid either way. If you’re in one of those states, email us and we’ll research yours next. Federal figures are the US Department of Education’s estimated FY2026 allocations.

● In depth

Eleven states, with the details.

Deadlines, award amounts, match requirements and who to call. If your state is here, you have most of a grant application already.

Best in the country

Indiana

Federal CTE funds this year$32,395,090

Program: K-12 Robotics Competition Grant, IC 20-20-45.5 — Indiana DOE
Awards: Tiered by team count: $25,000 (1–5 teams) · $50,000 (6–12) · $75,000 (13–18) · $100,000 (19+). Community teams up to $7,000 under HB 1233.
Match: 25% local or private, cash or in-kind. School fundraisers count; education general fund dollars do not.
Deadline: Mid-May, awards announced late August. Reimbursement grant — the school fronts the money.
Covers: Robotics kits, supplies, event registration, mentor stipends, transportation and travel.
Requires: A sponsor, business, or higher-ed partnership, plus a named mentor or coach.

One thing to check. A 2023 program FAQ excluded registration for state, world and international competitions — local events only. Confirm whether that still holds before you budget around it.

Separately, Indiana’s guidance on what CTE money can pay for permits CTSO advisor stipends and travel, materials to prepare for competitive events, and group student transportation — but not individual student registration fees, dues or travel.

Double-check the current award amounts with IDOE before you build a budget around them — the tiers are real but the numbers move.

Most generous rules in the US

Wisconsin

Federal CTE funds this year$25,516,443

Program: Robotics League Participation Grants, Wisconsin DPI
Award: Up to $6,000 per team. Grades 6–12. Public, charter, private and homeschool teams all eligible.
Match: 1:1 — total expenses must be at least twice the reimbursement.
Covers: Required fees, required kits, required supplies, travel to competition for team members and the mentor, and a mentor stipend.

This is the most generous list of covered costs we have found in any state. Most states fund the equipment and the coach but not the students’ registration and travel. Wisconsin funds both.

The clearest yes anywhere

Ohio

Federal CTE funds this year$52,648,058

Grants: CTE Equipment Grant (competitive) · CTE Access Grant — $3.2M total, up to $320,000 per project
Existing program: AWT RoboBots — 15 lb combat for grades 9–12, JuniorBots 3 lb for 6–8. Free to schools; local manufacturers sponsor teams and supply an industry advisor.
Priority: Ohio Top Jobs List programs receive priority for equipment grants.

Ohio says it outright. The state’s own guidance on CTE spending names “student preparation for and participation in technical skills competitions aligned with career-technical education program standards” as an allowable activity. That is the single most useful sentence a robotics coach can cite in any state.

The limit is the one nearly every state applies: advisor pay, advisor travel, and equipment essential to developing occupational skills are fundable. Students’ own lodging, food, registration fees and dues are not.

Rule of thumb for Ohio: the robot, the tools and the coach are fundable. The kids’ registration and travel are not.

State names the competition

Pennsylvania

Federal CTE funds this year$50,954,913

Program: PAsmart Grants, PA Dept of Education
Awards: CTE Planning Grants up to $75,000 · CTE Innovation Grants up to $500,000. Both require broad cross-sector partnerships.
Existing program: SWPA BotsIQ — high school 15 lb combat plus a free BotsIQ Academy, manufacturer-sponsored, 2026 finals at PennWest.

The most useful citation in Pennsylvania is not a grant — it is a list. PDE’s official Student Competitions page names BotsIQ and the National Robotics League alongside TSA and the PA Keystone STEM Competition. For a combat-robotics program, having the state education agency name your competition category as legitimate is worth more than most grant applications.

BotsIQ separately won a reported $498,000 grant to expand robotics and manufacturing training into Pittsburgh middle schools — so state STEM money has already gone to school robot combat here.

Biggest pots, hardest match

California

Federal CTE funds this year$142,867,852

CTEIG: Career Technical Education Incentive Grant — $450,000,000 available for 2026–27, formula-based, for LEAs, county offices, charters and ROC/Ps.
K12 SWP: K12 Strong Workforce Program — $150,000,000 annually, competitive, through eight regional community college consortia. Administered by the Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, not CDE.
Match: CTEIG requires $2 local for every $1 state. K12 SWP is 2:1 for districts, 1:1 for ROC/Ps. Under-matching reduces the award proportionally.
CTE pathway: Industry sector Engineering and Architecture — robotics normally sits in Engineering Design or Engineering Technology.
Existing program: Sustainable League of Combat Robotics — 1 lb antweight, mostly 3D-printed, middle and high school teams across Riverside and San Bernardino counties, run by Workforce SBCSS.

The gap worth knowing: CTEIG’s allowable-cost list covers equipment and materials to maintain industry standards, and transportation for CTE leadership and work-based-learning activities including after-school. But competitions, CTSOs and registration fees are neither explicitly allowed nor prohibited. That silence is worth a phone call to the CDE CTE Leadership Office before you build a budget on it.

The SLCR precedent matters more than the money. A California county office of education already runs a school combat-robotics league. If your district asks whether a school can really run this, that is your answer.

Formula, not application

Texas

Federal CTE funds this year$129,035,986

Mechanism: CTE Allotment, TEC §48.106 — there is no state robotics competition grant in Texas.
Weights: Grades 7–12: 1.1× for CTE courses outside an approved program · 1.28× for levels 1–2 in an approved program · 1.48× for levels 3–4. Plus $150 per ADA student in a TEA-designated P-TECH.
CTE funds: The CTE Allowable Cost Guide permits student transportation and registration to state and national CTSO leadership conferences, and equipment for CTE instruction meeting industry standards.

Texas money reaches robotics through the funding formula rather than a grant application. In practice your conversation is with the district CTE director, not the state. Get the program coded into an approved CTE sequence and the weight follows the student.

Robotics and non-CTSO competitions are not addressed either way in the state CTE guide. Confirm locally rather than assuming.

One rule to know first

Nevada

Federal CTE funds this year$12,837,087

The rule: Nevada’s FY26 CTE Uses of Funds guidance states plainly: student travel to non-CTSO competition-based events is not an allowable use of funds.
What is allowed: Student travel costs and registration fees for CTSO competitions — DECA, FBLA, FCCLA, FFA, HOSA, SkillsUSA and TSA. Plus supplies and equipment supporting instruction toward state standards.
Teacher PD: Nevada Robotics at DRI — educator academies, METRICS paid PD, and a free robot lending library for participants. Teacher training, not team grants.

The workaround is real, and worth knowing before you write a budget. An independent league is not a CTSO, so Nevada state CTE money cannot pay student travel to it. But TSA runs robotics competitive events and SkillsUSA runs Mobile Robotics — affiliating your team through TSA or SkillsUSA moves student travel and registration from unallowable to allowable.

Nevada also runs OSIT STEM grants, including a STEM Workforce Challenge Grant and a K–5 STEM Education Program Grant. Those pages we haven’t been able to confirm yet.

Two funding streams

Arizona

Federal CTE funds this year$34,386,034

Federal CTE grant: Secondary LEAs including districts, charters and private non-profit charters. Application window 1 July – 1 August. ADE CTE Grants
State Priority Grant: Formula: 75% enrollment-based, 25% related-placement-based.
CTEDs: Arizona’s Career and Technical Education Districts are a separate and substantial secondary CTE funding structure worth approaching directly.

No named state robotics or STEM competition grant was found in Arizona. The route is federal CTE funds plus the State Priority Grant, and for many schools the CTED is the more productive conversation.

We haven’t been able to confirm Arizona’s rules on funding competition travel. Ask ADE’s CTE fiscal office directly before you budget for it — and tell us what they say, so we can put it here for the next teacher.

Funds the coach by name

Michigan

Federal CTE funds this year$46,663,531

Program: Robotics Competition Grant (99h), Michigan Dept of Education
Awards: Coach stipends up to $1,500 per building, plus Support Awards covering registration, materials and travel, and Advancement Awards.
Match: 25%.
Also: MiSTEM Network grants, administered through Michigan LEO.

Michigan is one of very few states that funds the coach by name. Coach burnout is the most common reason a new robotics program does not reach a second season, which makes a stipend line more valuable per dollar than an equipment line.

Certifications, not competitions

Florida

Federal CTE funds this year$83,166,060

Mechanism: CAPE Act performance funding through FEFP. No named state robotics grant was found.
Weights: 0.3 FTE for a student completing three or more courses and an industry certification in a single CTE program. 0.08 for an A in career dual enrollment leading to a listed certification.
Gatekeeper: The CAPE Industry Certification Funding List — a robotics program earns money only if it leads to a certification on this list.
CTE pathway: Engineering cluster — Engineering Technology and Engineering Pathways frameworks.

Florida rewards certifications, not trophies. A robotics program that terminates in a listed industry certification generates real FEFP money; one that only produces competition results generates none. Design the course sequence around the certification list first, then hang the league on it.

Fees and supplies covered

Utah

Federal CTE funds this year$17,394,096

Program: STEM Competition Grant, Utah STEM Action Center
Award: Up to $5,000 per school, capped at $100 per student. Opens 1 August, closes 31 August annually.
Covers: Registration fees, student supplies, in-state travel.
Excludes: Apparel, meals, teacher compensation, hardware, and out-of-state competitions.

This grant currently names specific competitions in its eligibility rules, so check the current list before you apply. If you want to bring a Robot Battle League team, talk to the STEM Action Center early and tell us — we will help you make the case.

Note the hardware exclusion — this grant pays fees and supplies, not robots.

● Small money goes a long way here

A $2,500 grant buys fifty robots.

Most classroom STEM grants top out between $500 and $5,000. In most robotics programmes that is not enough to start — one competition robot can cost more than the whole grant, so teachers skip these and go hunting for something bigger. At our prices $2,500 is a class set. That changes which grants are worth your afternoon.

What a grant of each size actually buys
If you win	You can buy	Which is
$500	10 Micro robots	a small club, or one rotating class set
$2,500	50 Micro robots	every student in two sections, with spares
$5,000	50 Micros and 3 team kits	a class set, plus a squad that travels

Event packs, track plans, score sheets and inspection checklists are free, so none of the grant goes on rules or fields. The tabletop events need a roll of tape and a folding table.

● Four you can apply for yourself

Grants a teacher applies for, not a district.

Checked August 2026 — confirm on the funder’s own page before you write anything
Grant	Amount	Who applies	When
Rural Technology Fund	$500–$2,500	Public schools and libraries in rural or high-poverty areas	Rolling — reviewed every 30 to 60 days
Toshiba America Foundation	up to $5,000	An individual teacher, grades 6–12	Four windows a year: 1 March, 1 June, 1 September, 1 December
NEA Foundation Envision Equity	up to $5,000	NEA members	Register by 10 September, apply by 15 September
DonorsChoose	no cap	Any public school teacher in the US	Any time — it is crowdfunded, not a committee

Deadlines move and programmes close. If one of these has changed, tell us and we will fix this table the same week.

Rural Technology Fund is the one most teachers miss.

It is small, it is rolling, and it says outright that it funds robotics kits. There is no season to wait for and no board meeting — a decision usually comes inside two months. If your school is rural or high-poverty, it is the shortest path there is between wanting a team and owning one.

Write the request around equipment you keep.

A reviewer reading “$2,500 for fifty robots that thirty students will use every year for five years” is being handed an easy yes. The same money described as fees, travel or consumables is a much harder one. Ask for the robots. Everything else on the list is free anyway.

● Other ways to pay for it

Two more places the money can come from.

🏭

The manufacturer down the road

This is the one that works best, and almost nobody tries it. Machine shops, fabricators and contract manufacturers near your school are desperate for young people who aren’t afraid of a shop floor. Sponsoring a team costs them less than one recruiting ad. Several school robot-combat programmes in Ohio and Pennsylvania are free to schools entirely on local manufacturer money.

📈

Title IV-A

A federal grant of roughly $1.38 billion nationally that your district already receives, meant partly for a “well-rounded education.” STEM programming is a standard use. Ask your district’s federal programmes coordinator — they will know the name immediately.

Stuck? Send us your state and your school and we’ll help you figure out which pot to ask. We do this every week and we don’t charge for it. Need something to hand your principal? Print the one-page proposal → hello@robotbattleleague.com

● Next

Four steps, and most of them are short.

Step 1

Find your state above

Note the grant name and the deadline if there is one.

Step 2

Ask us for a quote

We’ll send something your business office can process, worded for a CTE budget line — and there is a one-page proposal you can print right now.

Step 3

Call one local manufacturer

One phone call. The worst case is they say no and you’re where you started.

Step 4

Claim a founding spot

Sixty for the first season, at $499 with free registration.

Ask for a quote See how it works